Posts Tagged ‘Mortgage’

Stabilizing The Housing Market

November 17 2008

There is a plan for the government to partially insure lenders, if they will agree to modify troubled borrowers’ loan terms that could help stabilize housing markets, restore confidence, and bring buyers back into the market.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. chairwoman Sheila Bair wants the Bush administration to provide incentives for lenders to do as many as 2.2 million loan modifications.

On Friday the F.D.I.C. unveiled a proposal (see http://www.fdic.gov/consumers/loans/loanmod/index.html) that the government would pay servicers $1,000 for each loan modified to defray their expenses, and then agree to cover up to 50 percent of losses if a loan should re-default.

If we Assume one in three modified loans will re-default, the plan would cost taxpayers $24.4 billion, but prevent 1.5 million foreclosures by the end of next year, the FDIC said.

The plan and others intended to slow or stop foreclosures could help stabilize housing markets, but "speed is of the essence," said Paul Bishop, managing director of research for the National Association of Realtors.

NAR also wants Congress make credit more easily available to would-be homebuyers. One way to do that, the group says, would be to make permanent the temporary increase in the upper loan limits for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and FHA. The limits, boosted in February to $729,750 in high cost areas, are set to come back down to $625,500 on Jan. 1.

NAR has also been adamant that the Bush administration use at least some of the $700 billion earmarked for the Troubled Assets Repurchase Program, or TARP, the way it originally said it would: to buy up "toxic" assets like mortgage backed securities. But after earmarking the first $250 billion in TARP funds to buy shares in troubled banks, the Treasury Department now says it does not plan to buy any mortgage-backed securities.

The FDIC’s foreclosure prevention plan and the buyers incentives and access to mortgage credit advocated by NAR are complimentary in what they aim to accomplish.

Limiting the amount of foreclosures not only slows growth in inventory and slows price declines, but it also provides reassurance to would-be homebuyers who are reluctant to buy into a downturn.

Once that happens, the government must also make sure that buyers who are ready to get off the fence have the financing and incentives needed to make that happen.

First-time homebuyers are key to a recovery, because they are the the least encumbered. They don’t have a existing home to sell, and may be able to get out into the market more quickly than a homeowner who needs to sell a home first

Although the Bush administration was said to be weighing Bair’s plan, last week it rolled out a less ambitious loan modification plan involving Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the HOPE NOW alliance of 27 loan servicers (see story)(http://www.inman.com/news/2008/11/11/new-plan-seeks-streamline-loan-mods).

The administration’s plan, which FHA Commissioner Brian Montgomery said might help "hundreds of thousands of borrowers," involves a streamlined loan modification process in which borrowers’ loan payments would be reduced to 38 percent of gross monthly income by lowering their interest rate, lengthening the term of the loan, or reducing principal and adding it to the back of the loan.

Having placed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in receivership, the government has a large say in how they are run. But while Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee about 58 percent of all single-family mortgages, those mortgages represent only 20 percent of serious delinquencies.

About 60 percent of seriously delinquent mortgages have been sold to investors in private-label mortgage-backed securities who may be less willing to engage in loan modifications.

The FDIC said that while foreclosures are costly to lenders, the pace of loan modifications continues to be "extremely slow." Only 4 percent of seriously delinquent loans are modified each month, the FDIC said.

Fannie and Freddie have boosted loan modifications by 60 percent this year, but are still only averaging 4,600 a month. About 92 percent of borrowers Fannie and Freddie have worked with have been able to keep their homes.

Why isn’t there more excitement with the $7,500 First-Time Buyer IRS Tax Credit?

November 10 2008

 

What is a potential home buyer to do? There is widespread negative publicity about the future of real estate values. There is negativeity regarding the difficulty in securring mortgage financing, home foreclosures and the collapse of financial institutions. They are experiencing an huge drop in the value of their investment portfolios. They have concern with the security of their job. Can you blame buyers for not rushing into a long term financial commitment, such as purchasing a home?

but,……. there are buyers setting appointments daily to see homes. There are buyers where buying a home is a necessity, or is more preferred than continuing to rent with no tax deduction. While total sale transactions may be down in many real estate markets, home purchases and real estate closings continue.

So why isn’t there more excitement and more publicity in the Realtor community with the $7,500 First-Time Buyer IRS Tax Credit included in the Housing and Recovery Act of 2008?

Throughout 2008, Realtors have tirelessly promoted the benefits of purchasing a home in the current real estate market (favorable mortgage interest rates, lower real estate values, available listing inventory, etc). There is not much more effort in promoting the benefits a tax credit like this can be to first-time buyers. Combined with lower interest rates, a huge selection of the many homes for sale and more affordable home prices than ever, this tax credit may be just the thing many first time buyers need to move forward and make a commitment to purchase a home now, rather than just look at homes and wait for a better time to buy.

The $7,500 First-Time Buyer IRS Tax Credit applies to first-time buyer home purchases of a principle residence between April 9, 2008 and July 1, 2009. It is a tax credit and not a tax deduction. A tax credit is a reduction in income taxes owed! In other words, when a buyer files their income taxes for the year the home was purchased (2008 or 2009), they may be able to subtract $7,500 from the amount of federal income tax liability, which will either increase their tax refund or reduce the amount of tax still owed.

However, this tax credit is not free. It has to be paid back. Repayment begins two years after the credit is claimed, and must be repaid within 15 years. That’s $500 per year. Yes, it would have been much better if there was no repayment provision, but an interest-free loan for 15 years is not such a bad thing, is it? That’s right; there is no interest on the tax credit received.